Software Asset Management Tools
Oomnitza: features, pricing and who it fits
Oomnitza began in hardware asset management and added software and SaaS licensing later. It reconciles entitlements, installs and usage pulled from many connected systems, including ServiceNow, Jira and Zendesk. The G2 summary rates support highly, though some users find the interface confusing.
Who Oomnitza is for
Best for
- IT teams that want hardware and software asset data reconciled in one system
- Organizations with ServiceNow, Jira or Zendesk that want connected ticketing
Look elsewhere if
- Buyers who need public pricing
- Teams that only need lightweight SaaS spend tracking
Fit by company size
| Category | 1-10 people | 11-50 people | 51-500 people | 500+ people |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software Asset Management Tools | No data | No data | No data | Workable |
Strong fitWorkablePoor fitNo data from the vendor
Oomnitza features
- SaaS coverage
- Covers installed software and SaaS in one license position
- License compliance
- Reconciles entitlements, deployments and usage; audit readiness across publishers
- Discovery
- Not described for software; hardware data reconciled from procurement, MDM, EDR and ITSM sources
- ITSM integration
- ServiceNow, Jira and Zendesk listed among 1,500+ data surfaces
- Pricing
- Quote-based
Pros and cons
What users like
- Strong support (G2 summary scores it 9.5/10)
- Good asset discovery and dashboards
- Wide integration coverage
Common complaints
- Confusing UI for some users
- Steep learning curve
- Slow performance in places (SaaSWorthy)
Integrations, security and hosting
- Integrations
- 1,500+ data surfaces, including ServiceNow, Jira, Zendesk
Worth knowing before you buy
- Started as hardware and IT asset management; software and SaaS license management is a later module
- Data comes from connectors to MDM, EDR, procurement and ITSM, not a single agent (hardware description)
- Reported funding round labels conflict: 2020 Business Wire release says $12.5M Series B, later sources list $20M in 2021
- SaaSWorthy rates it 4.8 from about 140 ratings, higher than G2
- Vendor site states no implementation time or target size
